71 Untitled

Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed. Respectfully disagreed.

posted at 02:17 pm on June 20, 2006 by Daniel Lynch

72 JS instead of CSS

“You can also use CSS to hide the fields that are already filled in correctly and only display those which need to be corrected.”

Why use CSS? CSS is for design. This is not a design element, this is a behaviour. For define behaviours of our document, we have to use JavaScript. Imagine if the user clears away the stylesheet, or defines his/her own.
First the (x)html, then write JS, and CSS should be the last component.

posted at 10:43 am on July 27, 2006 by Joó �dám

73 Good read

But is there are any css hack to make select input looks a bit less ugly

Cheers

posted at 01:02 am on November 3, 2006 by Viz Abdelli

Discussion Closed

New comments are not being accepted, but you are welcome to explore what people said before we closed the door.

Got something to say?

Discuss this article. We reserve the right to delete flames, trolls, and wood nymphs.

Create a new account or sign in below if you’d like to leave a comment.

Forgot your password?

Subscribe to this article's comments: RSS (what’s this?)