1 raw data available

Is the raw table of data available? I would be highly interested in looking at it myself.

posted at 02:59 pm on June 21, 2011 by beaucronin

2 Total Surveyed

Maybe I missed it, but can you post how many people responded to your survey?

posted at 03:10 pm on June 21, 2011 by typodactyl

3 http://www.visualizing.org/

Will this become available on www.visualizing.org? This request may be an addition to the #1 “raw” request. Thank you, ala!

posted at 02:28 pm on June 22, 2011 by fwsue

4 Found it..

Thank you, found the data at http://aneventapart.com/alasurvey2010/add.html
Super.

posted at 02:32 pm on June 22, 2011 by fwsue

5 Rogue Chart?

One of the charts in section 4 confusingly doesn’t match the structure of the others and is therefore hard to interpret—it looks the same visually, but the data on figure 4.6 was plotted differently.

All the other “Satisfaction by X” charts show “x” down the left side: The labels on “4.5 Satisfaction by Age Range” indicate ages; likewise, “4.7 Satisfaction by Geographic Region” quite reasonably lists geographic locations. However, the chart in between them, “4.6 Satisfaction by gender,” shows levels of satisfaction down the left rather than gender. In other words, figure 4.6 is actually showing “Gender by Satisfaction”, which isn’t nearly as meaningful as satisfaction by gender would be.

posted at 07:04 pm on June 22, 2011 by mmayer344

6 Timeline

While the graphs are great every year, would love to timeline the results you’ve created over the last few years and be able to move a slider and watch results change.

posted at 05:51 pm on June 26, 2011 by pitchandtone

7

it’s so excited to see evolution state of web. who knows which form will have web in the near future…

thanks a lot for that article…

posted at 04:55 am on June 28, 2011 by Saç kaynak

8

Hi, I just found your blog and think its great! You are exactly what I was looking for. Would you be able to give me your feedback about this outsourcing payment website? http://bit.ly/luYUpg

Thanks so much!

posted at 11:39 pm on June 28, 2011 by rodg

9

Thanks for putting this together. As mentioned previously it would be nice to see a timeline over the years to get a better understanding of how things have shifted, as it’s a bit hard to get a feel from referencing past years numbers.

posted at 06:07 pm on July 11, 2011 by Jeff Massa

10 A slight typo

Great use of Web Standards for visualization. Wilson Miner would be proud. I spotted a typo at

http://aneventapart.com/alasurvey2010/01.html
Fig. 1.5 Percentage of job-title holders who earn salaries of $100k+

“A significantly greater percentage of Information Architects, Usability Experts, Creative Directors, Information Architects, Accessibility Experts, and Web Directors make more than $100,000.”

“Information Architects” repeated twice.

Cheers,
James

posted at 03:57 am on July 12, 2011 by James Abbott