Discuss: A List Apart 4.0
by Jeffrey Zeldman
- Editorial Comments
182 A dissenting voice?
Sorry to be late to the party but I’m a busy man. I haven’t had time to read all the comments but the ones I have read seem to like ALA 4.0. I don’t.
But if you move that bloody logo (I hate branding) over to the right of the viewport so I can read the, mostly, brilliant articles and interesting comments on them without having to SCROLL HORIZONTALLY I’ll change my mind. But if anyone tells me to make my browser window wider I’ll scream and probably not visit ALA again. User rules OK (since CSS2, anyway).
I quite like the ‘live’ comment preview though it was lucky that I had scripting enabled. Not everybody does you know and I haven’t been able to find any noscript tags in the XHTML source. ( http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/wai-pageauth.html#tech-scripts , I think.)
posted at 08:35 pm on September 6, 2005 by Mike Stone
183 not so good
You make over 25% of page left side completely useless. This huge logo is so important? Very good content, but scary design. Old ALA layout was much better for me.
posted at 11:33 pm on September 6, 2005 by Albert Lavrentyev
184 You guys practice what you preach
- Tasteful combination of serif and sans serif types. (The small font is just fine) – Perfect application of big space on the left which is a basic layout principle of white space. – Palette that gives the site a mature and respectable air.
Totally inspiring. Best design ever!
posted at 01:17 am on September 7, 2005 by Hans Barroga
185 I like ALA
I always found ALA a great source for CSS stuff. But now it looks like a cornflakes box. Maybe the web will look in general more like a cornflakes box with CSS. Certainly that impression arouses when you look at some designers’ pages … Talking about the old ALA as looking “conservative” I don’t know how to call this. But maybe such things come after publishing books and growing up.
Best greetings.
posted at 06:35 am on September 8, 2005 by Dragan Espenschied
186 Indeed!
I was suprised to see a new design. I do like it though.
I also plan to buy all three of the ALA shirts when I get paid.
posted at 09:17 pm on September 10, 2005 by ryan dugger
187 Indeed!
I was suprised to see a new design. I do like it though.
I also plan to buy all three of the ALA shirts when I get paid.
posted at 09:17 pm on September 10, 2005 by ryan dugger
188 Congratulates! Zeldman
Congratulates! version 4.0 was born.
And thanks ZELDMAN, always give me best ways for standards
posted at 02:56 am on September 16, 2005 by Chengju Zhang
189 thanks!
I love new ala’s dress “molto elegante”.
Thank you for your great work.
posted at 09:37 pm on September 16, 2005 by olivia del bufalo
190 what about closed discussions
When the discussion are closed, the link to the Discussions is removed. Atleast let me read what was already discussed, even if new discussions are not allowed. Perhaps someone already asked the question similar to mine and it was answered.
As it stands I’m stranded.
posted at 04:00 am on September 17, 2005 by Ziyad Saeed
Discussion Closed
New comments are not being accepted, but you are welcome to explore what people said before we closed the door.
Got something to say?
Discuss this article. We reserve the right to delete flames, trolls, and wood nymphs.
Create a new account or sign in below if you’d like to leave a comment.
Subscribe to this article's comments: RSS (what’s this?)






181 The new colour scheme
I noticed the new colour scheme for Issue 202 still uses brown for the hover background on links. Shouldn’t it be a shade of green? Also I was thinking the main ALA logo would change colour too with each issue. Anyway, great site! Keep it up. So glad you’re back.
posted at 07:22 am on September 6, 2005 by Chris Hester